All reports
lielow_displayed reports
#77620: "Confirm Timer"
rejected: Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high
1
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
I think the confirm button should have like a 30 second timer on it 'cos it can be easy to forget, especially on turn based and just move on to another game without realising it's still waiting for you to confirm• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v108
Report history
15. Dec 2022 21:05 • GTSchemer • Developers would like more information about this suggestion:
I am normally very against confirm timers because they can cause problems for mobile users, but it might be possible.
Is the user preference to disable confirm sufficient?
Also, when moving on to other turn-based games, BGA will still move the player back to Lielow if confirm was not clicked.
Is the user preference to disable confirm sufficient?
Also, when moving on to other turn-based games, BGA will still move the player back to Lielow if confirm was not clicked.
27. Dec 2022 17:43 • GTSchemer • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
Closing due to the user preference which allows you to disable confirmation, and turn-based mode already prompting. If this becomes an issue in beta I can revisit.
Add something to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
