• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• What is your browser?

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• What is your browser?

• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?

• What is your browser?

• Which was the game action you wanted to do?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?

• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?

• What is your browser?

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• What is your browser?

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?

• What is your browser?

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.

I've played two games in which two other players (presumably cooperating with each other) deliberately avoided killing me when they could have, by just discarding Bang! and other offensive cards instead of playing them. Statistically, if two out of three players refuse to play to win, then there are situations where the game can continue indefinitely: e.g. if the third player never gets a gun or a Cat Balou and the other two both have a Mustang, or if one of the malicious players is Pedro Ramirez and can apply the jail gauntlet. Proposing to abandon the game is not effective if the other players are deliberately trying to prolong the game and force the non-malicious player to quit.

It would be helpful to detect these situations (a player having offensive cards but not playing those cards for many turns in a row) and then give any single player the option to end the game unilaterally without using karma.

• What is your browser?