#99660: "Defender should have a wait-button"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY -
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
• What is your browser?
Opera
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Opera
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY • What is your browser?
Opera
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY • What is your browser?
Opera
-
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• What is your browser?
Opera
-
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY -
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Opera
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Opera
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY • What is your browser?
Opera
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Opera
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
seen in #15 for example:
Defender should have the option to wait for more attacking cards from attackers that didn't pass yet - this is a often used tactic in the real game. Before defending with new numbers or trump cards, which would give the attackers new possibilities, the defender could wait what other attack cards might come in before he answers.
The defender should be notified after each new attack card, but can chose to wait again if there are still more players who haven't answered yet.
TY • What is your browser?
Opera
Report history
You can either spend your time to wait for other players, or play cards and stop your timer.
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
