All reports
piepmatz_displayed reports
#96613: "Please darken the number outline on cards"
rejected: Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high
1
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Please darken the number outline on cards. It is hard to read them on my phone. Especially yellow and brown.• What is your browser?
Chrome
Report history
23. Aug 2023 10:58 • muddypawprints • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
23. Aug 2023 15:53 • hersh • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
Artwork is the same as the physical game. I don’t see the graphics being adjusted.
23. Aug 2023 15:59 • muddypawprints • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
I didn’t ask for the artwork to be changed. But as you can see from my screenshot, the yellow card numbers are hard to read. Perhaps the contrast on them can be tweaked?
24. Aug 2023 16:25 • hersh • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
BGA has custom css; can try that approach (boardgamearena.com/doc/Css_Customization). then artwork can stay as provided.
something along the following line could work:
.bgagame-piepmatz .birdcard
{
filter:brightness(0.8) contrast(2);
}
above would make the cards look like this image linked at imgur.com/aQVNlVD
something along the following line could work:
.bgagame-piepmatz .birdcard
{
filter:brightness(0.8) contrast(2);
}
above would make the cards look like this image linked at imgur.com/aQVNlVD
24. Aug 2023 16:34 • hersh • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
note : custom css blocks bug report access; it has to be reset/blanked out to restore access.
5. Sep 2023 21:15 • muddypawprints • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
Thank you! That is so much better! Much appreciated!
Add something to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
