All reports
tapestry_displayed reports
#83908: "Trader token for controlled territory not scored correctly"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
Rules: a rule of the game has not been respected
Detailed description
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
With the new traders, both the opponent and the trader token should be considered active for control when scoring territories. Those territories were not counted.• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
Yes look at final scoring, scoring for controlled territories should be two more for the two additional trader tokens• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v111
Report history
21. Mar 2023 12:35 • anonaddict • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
It's visible in the logs
24. Apr 2023 20:27 • Ziggyny • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
This just happened to me in game 369419425. Move 520-525. I rolled the 'points for controlled territories' side of the conquer dice but it only gave me 5 points, not the 7 I was expecting since I have 2 'shared control' territories from Traders.
22. Sep 2023 18:12 • Akhrinor • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
This just happened to me on game 326451239 (boardgamearena.com/table?table=326451239). I did not receive points for my trader tokens on opponent territories, where we should have shared control for scoring purposes, as per the rules.
26. Sep 2023 6:00 • NaCl_duke • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
same here
boardgamearena.com/table?table=421765957
boardgamearena.com/table?table=421765957
19. Jan 2024 15:42 • neandrothal • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
According to the designer, Trader tokens should NOT count for control of a territory.
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2278870/traders-player-token-adjacency-question
However, current version of the game (boardgamearena.com/9/tapestry?table=455632201) gives a Trader the opportunity to play a Trap card when an opponent attempts to conquer a territory with (only) a Trader token.
Trap text reads: "You may discard this card from your hand when an opponent tries to conquer your territory."
If the Trader token does not provide control of a territory, then it shouldn't count as "your territory" and thus the Trader player should not be able to play a Trap.
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2278870/traders-player-token-adjacency-question
However, current version of the game (boardgamearena.com/9/tapestry?table=455632201) gives a Trader the opportunity to play a Trap card when an opponent attempts to conquer a territory with (only) a Trader token.
Trap text reads: "You may discard this card from your hand when an opponent tries to conquer your territory."
If the Trader token does not provide control of a territory, then it shouldn't count as "your territory" and thus the Trader player should not be able to play a Trap.
20. Jun 2024 14:38 • depflow • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
I had this problem. Traders currently grant control of a territory when they shouldnt
22. Jun 2024 4:27 • Matt in the Hat • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
Ditto that trader tokens do NOT give control of the territory, so the traders may NOT conquer a space that is only next to one of their tokens. Also traders may NOT play a trap if a space with their token is conquered.
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2271743/traders-question
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2278870/traders-player-token-adjacency-question
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2271743/traders-question
boardgamegeek.com/thread/2278870/traders-player-token-adjacency-question
5. Feb 2025 5:22 • twistedsciences86 • Bug has not been reproduced by delopers yet:
This just happened, to my benefit, in this game: boardgamearena.com/10/tapestry?table=623205333
Screenshot here: imgur.com/a/RVtrOMz
If it is not intended then it should definitely be addressed.
Screenshot here: imgur.com/a/RVtrOMz
If it is not intended then it should definitely be addressed.
Add something to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
