All reports
catcafe_displayed reports
#74757: "Option to hide the moves during the simultaneous phase"
acknowledged: Developers agree that it is a good idea and intend to work on it
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Allow a way to hide what/where you are selecting during the simultaneous phase, at least as a game option
(maybe similarly to how Railroad Ink handles it) • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
Report history
28. Oct 2022 21:11 • Ez0ah • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
Although the game is sweet, some people will play it competitively (Arena mode for instance)
And if you can see what other players are doing, you can wait for them to do their move before choosing yours, for things like yarn majority, first to column or triggering endgame. Stalling is never a fun thing
it doesn't have to be the default mode, but I think the game option should be there at least
And if you can see what other players are doing, you can wait for them to do their move before choosing yours, for things like yarn majority, first to column or triggering endgame. Stalling is never a fun thing
it doesn't have to be the default mode, but I think the game option should be there at least
7. Nov 2022 6:37 • phobyjuan • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
I will study how it can be done.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Thanks for your suggestion.
11. Nov 2022 12:13 • Ez0ah • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
If I recall correctly, Living Forest had a similar change when it went to beta (turning a simultaneous phase where everything was public into a simultaneous with hidden info)
15. Nov 2022 20:23 • Wolfgang Bader • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
Really important suggestion!!!!
28. Nov 2022 3:50 • shawnaax3 • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
I agree, this suggestion would do wonders for this game!
28. Nov 2022 8:52 • phobyjuan • Developers agree that it is a good idea and intend to work on it:
I will study how to do it.
Thanks for your feedback.
Thanks for your feedback.
15. Dec 2022 2:17 • stamo • Developers agree that it is a good idea and intend to work on it:
very important and I think it should be default - thanks for looking into it, this is such a cute & fun game :)
1. Jan 2023 20:40 • Stuff by Bez • Developers agree that it is a good idea and intend to work on it:
I don't think it should be an option - I think it should be the default
6. Feb 2023 22:12 • Zwollywood • Developers agree that it is a good idea and intend to work on it:
Fully agree with this suggestion. It's kind of lame the one waiting for the opponent to go first got more info and can anticipate on their opponents move.
24. Nov 2023 10:21 • norveeg • Developers agree that it is a good idea and intend to work on it:
how is that possible that within 1 year it's still the same as it was?
the lack of this ruins the whole game.
opponents waiting for days for the other to play first... c'mon!
the lack of this ruins the whole game.
opponents waiting for days for the other to play first... c'mon!
Add something to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
