#62281: "player paid one less card for a tile without using power"
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
What happened ? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are taken care of in PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. -
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. -
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. -
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
By using the Construction Discount one player should pay one less card to place a tile.
In the reported table/move I had 3 red cards and selected a 3-square red tile. I also had Construction Discount available but did not use it.
After my move I only spent 2 red cards.
The same happened again in move 113, 119 until in move 133 I used Construction Discount for a green tile that was charged correctly.
Please note in move 133 the game would prevent me placing the tile without using the Discount. • What is your browser?
Mozilla v5
Report history
Thanks for taking the time to leave feedback!
After reviewing the replay, I believe this is all functioning correctly.
You're correct that the construction discount ability knocks off the cost of one card. However, there is a second way to reduce the cost of a facade tile - by playing it adjacent to another tile of the same color already on your player board.
I'd invite you to play around with this and see what strategies you can cook up with it. Should you try to gobble up all of one color and deny your opponents? Or maybe leave open gaps in your board to try and maximize opportunities for this bonus.
Particularly cool is how the Construction Discount and adjacent discount work together... say on a 2 square piece...
I'm going to close this as not a bug, but feel free to leave more info if I misunderstood.
Add something to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
