#161133: "Didn't agree about dead stones, resumed play, then game didn't count dead stones."

• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if any.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• Please explains what you wanted to do, what you do and what happened
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Which part of the rules was not respected by the BGA adaptation
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Which was the game action you wanted to do?
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• What do you try to do to trigger this game action?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• What happened when you try to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
No errors, the game simply ended without allowing use to mark the dead stones. The game didn't identify the dead stones correctly, and didn't even ask if we agreed with the counting result. As several stones were not marked as dead, I lost the stones and the territory they were in.

In my recent table, #642822106, my opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?", which almost cost me the game. This violates the rules of the game.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• At which step of the game did the problem occurs (what was the current game instruction)?
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• What happened when you try to do a game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
My opponent and I didn't agree about the marking of dead stones, so we resumed play. My opponent selected "No" to the question, "Do you want to have a stage of designate dead stones after next series of passes?" He was losing, and by selecting "no", he almost won the game, as the game didn't mark the dead stones, and didn't give my the resulting 36 points I should have received.

I only won because I was far enough ahead in points. However, Go is usually so close in score that every point makes a huge difference. This prevents people from playing by the rules.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3

• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Table #642822106

Have the game count the dead stones to give the proper score to both players.
• What is your browser?
Firefox v133.0.3