All reports
sail_displayed reports
#128099: "Another place for discard pile."
rejected: Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high
1
What is this report about?
What happened ? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
IMO it would be better if discard pile positioning was below the column of players characters, because when you expand that pile now, cards cover the character and, eventually, almost all the player zone.• What is your browser?
Google Chrome v126
Report history
21. Jun 2024 21:15 • EnTuMesa o EnLaMia • This suggestion has not been analyzed by delopers yet:
I think add another row below players and kraken spaces, with "draw" pile and then discard pile, would be enough.
22. Jun 2024 1:29 • ufm • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
Rejected, doing so requires too much space and forces players to scroll up and down constantly.
12. Dec 2024 18:08 • forensicpenguin • Developers think that it is not a good idea or that the cost/benefit ratio is too high:
I agree with this, the kraken deck obscures the discard pile.
Perhaps have the kraken deck splay vertically down? Or even just slightly stagger/offset so the tops of one of the card piles is still visible.
Perhaps have the kraken deck splay vertically down? Or even just slightly stagger/offset so the tops of one of the card piles is still visible.
Add something to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appears several time? Everytime? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
